Thursday, February 18, 2010

Atheist Have Moral Values


I have often used Postings and Comments and on my Facebook Page to feature in my Blog. This is one of those times. I do some editing by not using full names and trying to edit the spelling and some structure but it is faithful to the content of the original discussion.

This Blog is based on a posting on my Page by a Friend(Louis) who is Conservative and Christian. He is interested in discussing why all Atheist are not practice hedonism. He believes that they are all pleasure seekers and cannot really believe they have commitments to the value of their fellowmen.

LET US BEGIN


Louis I've given your many thoughts and beliefs some serious thought. Now I am more confused then ever.

If you are atheist then why do you care about the community so much? Wouldn't survival of the fittest be a better way to go?


Melvin
Louis my sentiments exactly! I have made this argument with atheist many times. I often correlate Hitler's belief structure in line with atheistic beliefs as a matter of fact.

Why care about life if it has no purpose or inerant value to it?
The problem is in your point of view. You find value in life to come. My only value has to be in this life. I find value in Life Itself. The Human Community is my Family. Accumulating wealth at the expense of Family would be self degradation. Christians make the mistake of thinking that being atheist is a license to be Evil. 
Hitler was in fact not an Atheist. Neither were those who conducted the Inquisition. Neither were Crusaders who killed men, women and Children. Evil lies in Intent, not in Belief. Many of my nearly 4000 friends in my Circle are Atheist or Agnostic or spiritual nonbelievers. Almost to the person they find value in Human life and believe in a social safety network that protects the intrinsic value of each human life.
Religious people all to often have the attitude that "If you refuse to accept what we believe we have a right to persecute you in the name of our God." Being Christian does not always lead to Love of your Fellow man. Being atheist almost always does in a Democratic Society.
What give this life value? Why is that value different for animals, bugs, plants and all other living things?

What makes man different?

William Hodge
I am Man. I also value the life of other animals, bugs, plants and all other living things. I value the whole living life organism. But I also understand the food chain and the fact that the energy for all life comes from the Sun (Son of God) through the plant to the grazer to the predator. There is a complex living process that we are a functioning part of. 

My immediate value is to the individuals that make up the community of man. But my total value lies in the dynamic life organism and my responsibility to the interdependent environment that supports this living system. 

You view life as system of independent entities competing with each other for survival. You reject evolution as a Christian Creationist, but embrace it as a Social System for men to live by. You present yourself as free and independent of responsibility for the community, even though you are interdependent with every every other member in the community. 

In the end, "We are all in the same boat". The question is, do you choose to throw some out of the boat because you do not find them useful and wish to be rid of the burden.
So lets talk food chain. Is man at the top? What if a tiger ate your wife? Would you write that off as just part of the food chain? Would you want it killed in retaliation or to protect others?
Reasoning, you seem to have the ability to reason your way through things. Why is man the only creature who can do this?
It would take more than one Tiger to eat my wife.
But that is really not the point. The ecological system that supports life is interdependent. The idea of a top predator is a mental concept to illustrate a directional process. In fact, the process is not directional. 


When a predator dies he is eaten by the worms and bacteria at the supposed bottom of the chain. Sometimes he gets eaten by the worms and bacteria before he dies. Sometimes he is eaten by vultures. The life system is interdependent and dynamic. The process is affected by evolving conditions. 

You are trying to apply a moral concept to a natural process. Morality is an artificial concept by man to define the effect our behavior has on our fellowman. It is not an Absolute. It is relative to the moral values and traditions of the community.

I suspect you are trying to maneuver me into saying man is special because god made him so. The truth is man is special because he has evolved more efficient survival behavior and skills than other predators. He is the most successful life form because he has so defined himself and there are no apparent challengers to his self assertion. At least not yet. As long as I am a member of the community of man I will strive to advance that assessment. I honor the intrinsic value of all men because I choose to do so.
Tough wife? Good thing I'm not on her Facebook friends list.

Choice, there you have it. You get to choose and you can reason through your choices. You honestly think you evolved from some animal that could not reason like a monkey or ape?
Why haven't more creatures evolved in to thinking, reasoning beings? Why only man?
Man is not the only one. You should do your research Louis. Their is strong evidence that both the the Chimpanzee and the Bonobo have the ability to both reason and be creative. They have rudimentary language and the ability to recognize symbols. Even the Ocean Mammals appear to have intelligence that may be superior to ours and they live in cooperative societies and varying culture from pod to pod. The development connection across species lines is irrefutable in both observation and DNA Science ( In fact - in every Scientific Discipline).

You simply refuse to accept the validity of Science if it causes you to question your origin. I can do nothing to convince you if fear trumps truth and reason in your though process so I will not try. It is just a pity that someone of your intellect would choose slavery over freedom. 


There is enough in life that compels us, without surrendering our ability to reason. The Quest for Knowledge is the pinnacle of man's achievement. If you abandon it because you prefer the comfort of the Lie of the Absolute, you abandon the power to be Human.
I did my research last night William and I am here to report my findings. Now you have explained everything away with your science so I'm not so sure your going to believe anything I tell you about my findings, but here it goes any way.

I watched the evening news. MSNBC, yes. Not that dreaded FOX you so despise. For one hour I watched as people got into car wrecks, robbed banks, raped, went to war, came home from war, had children, discussed money, spoke about global warming and complained about too much snow and cold, and fought about politics. There was one story about some dolphins. It had to do with people nursing them back to health so that they could return to the sea.


What struck me as odd was that there were no dolphins, Chimpanzees, bonobos, or any such creature in all the news making decisions about doing the right or wrong thing. Its the damnedest thing! Everyone of the news stories was about people making decisions between good and bad, right and wrong, love and hate.

Tell me again how closely related to a monkey we 
One last thought... It was MSNBC and they were all monkeys dressed in suites opinionating on the news.
Watching news is not Research. If you wish to start simple just use Google or Bing and then expand to Scientific Research on the subject. You are trying to be cute. I know you are not that Dumb.

 I will offer this quote by a famous Atheist to comment on your original question: “An atheist believes that deed must be done instead of prayer said. An atheist strives for involvement in life and not escape into death. He wants disease conquered, poverty vanished, war eliminated.” - Madalyn Murray O'Hair.

If one believes this is his only life and sees self-gratification as meaningless, then he accepts life itself as the Prime Value and all other value is predicated on that. To spend life preparing for your reward after Death is to pursue an illusion.
Yes I was being cute, but serious at the same time. You don't know any reasoning dolphins that are crack smoking bank robbers do you? Your atheist quests are all noble, but so long as man has the ability to reason, make choices and choose between serving himself, the community and/or God you will never get there.

Is your way the right way? It probably is if it is a choice. Will it ever come to fruition? Not possible here on earth. Will you ever be able to get all members of the community to agree and pursue your utopian society? Highly unlikely. Why? Because God gave us a choice to decide for ourselves how we want to server the community. No matter how much you want heaven on earth you won't get it until you pass on from this life.  
You are on the right path with your care and concern for the community. However, your two flaws are you act like a God in your persistence in controlling people and yet you don't believe in him.
Louis, I cannot act like God because there is no God. The notion of Absolute Perfection is an illusion. You might as well claim that I want to act like Zeus, or Horus or Quetzalcoatl. You could pretend that I was seeking the enlightenment of a Buddha. 

The truth is, I do not seek perfection. I seek choices that improve the Human condition. Others may make choices that are different because their chosen values are different. There are no absolutes - Only probabilities determined by by observation and application of Scientific Methodology.

I act according to the best truth I can arrive at. If you are trying to claim you know Absolute Truth because God has revealed it to you, I would have to be less than amused by that absurd notion. If you are afraid of what you do not know, and prefer to believe in the Mystery Knowledge of a beneficent Slave owning God, then you have my Pity. There is little else I can offer someone who has choosen Slavery over Freedom.
I still don't get your value system. If this is the only life you have why not just go gang busters with hot women, rich food, fine wine or live and let live. What do you care if the next guy decides to serve himself and not the community?

I have no claim on absolute truth. No one does. What I have is faith, blind as it my be. My faith tells me I
might be wrong and probably am about most everything. It doesn't dictate that I force it on you or persecute you and it promotes many of the same ideals that you have professed a strong belief in living.  The only difference is you are chasing truth here on earth and I have faith that I will find it after.
You are an intelligent man, Louis, But I admit you confuse me. You say you are a Christian and a Creationist. But it is obvious that you are not a Fundamentalist. Either that or you have never really studied the Bible and your belief is in Ritual and not Dogma. 

You have hope in life after death with no knowledge of the price you must pay to receive it. The Tragedy is that it doesn't exist. A literal translation of the Bible has no validity. It is Mythology that was created by the earliest civilizations to personify the teaching of early Astronomy, Pharmacology. and animal and plant fertility knowledge man learned through observation. 

It developed into the practice of Astrology, Drug rituals, and fertility rituals in Religious Dogma. All subsequent religion is derived from this mythology. When the Protestant Reformation separated the Bible from the Priesthood that protected its interpretation, the literal interpretation created an aberration of meaning that is totally absurd. 

One does not have to be a genius to figure that out. A rudimentary understanding of Science made that clear to me by the time I was 16. All of the study I've done in the intervening years has only verified my conclusion. You appear to live by slogans and not conviction.



I am genetically motivated to survive for as long as I can,but I am who I am partly by Choice. Self gratification was and is part of my life but it lacks a sense purpose. The Human Family will live much longer than me and does have value and my interest. The older I get the greater the urge to act with purpose to continue the development of both the Human Family and the whole organism of life. I have no reason to believe in a god and no motivation to accept Slavery to Dogma created by others. I value my interdependency with and responsibility to the Human Community and the Ecology System of the Whole Earth.




William Hodge

Friday, November 13, 2009

Science Created Religion 101

In the Beginning


In addition to his being willing to eat anything he could get into his mouth, the survival of man was aided by his ability to take what his senses perceived and store it as symbols that his mind conceived. An apple had a visual impact. It could also be smelt and felt and tasted and all of these externally perceived qualities could be combined into a mental conception and labeled with a word symbol. That produced a unified set of descriptive qualities.

"Genesis 2: 19 - 20 And out of the ground the Lord God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought them unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called ever living creature, that was the name there of; And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field.........."

In the beginning Men collected information about the objective reality through perception and internalized it as a conception with a label and expressed it as a sound. Sound labels were externalized and agreed upon as objective realities of the perceptions that they identified. Language was born. Everyone who learned the spoken word knew what an Apple was.  Conception begat communication which begat community which begat personified knowledge. Labels of sound acquired power to create internal concepts and Religion was born.

"Genesis 1:1 ......God created the heavens and the earth.
Genesis 1:3 Then God SAID, "Let their be Light."
Genesis 1:6 Then God SAID, "Let there be an expanse."
Genesis 1:9 Then God SAID, "Let the waters...be gathered"
Genesis 1:11 Then God SAID, "Let the earth sprout vegetation"

Creation by sound proceeded from Jewish mythology to Christian Mythology:

"Gospel of John 1:1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.
1:2 He was in the beginning with God.
1:3 All things came into being through Him; and apart from Him nothing came into being.
1:4 In Him was life and the life was the light of men".

Most Fundamentalist Christians refer to the Bible as the Word of God. In Fact the Christ was the
Word of God (The Creator) and the Bible is about him. The Bible is not in itself Holy.

Today we use the word Amen (Hebrew) in prayer because it signifies Creation of Truth. It is used to mean,"So be it." It is derived from the Egyptian  Amon, also spelled Amun, Amen, or Ammon, a deity who was revered as king of the gods.

In Hindu mantra chants it is the sound Ahmmmm that is the sound of creation. When Jesus uses the words Verily, Verily it has the same root. That is why the Christ Mythology refers to him as "The Way, The Truth, and the Light". It is derived from the concept of the SUN (Son) God. The Christ Myth has  the Concept becoming Manifest in Perception creating Reality.  Science works in the opposite direction,  Perception is manifest in the form of Concept in the mind. Religion accepts the Concept as absolute unchanging truth and resist the nature of perception to change the view of knowledge.

In some cultures, the Serpent is the Hero in the Garden of Eden story. He taught man that knowledge is to be sought. God wanted knowledge to be accepted by man as dictated to him by Religious Dogma or Mythology.

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Give me Freedom or Give me Money



Freedom is a strong word and a condition to be desired. Patrick Henry said it with ultimate emotion when he said "Give me Liberty or give me Death". The problem is not in the strength of the emotion, but in the content of its character. 

 The Beloved Comedian Jack Benny had a great story about being confronted with a mugger who said, "Your money or your life." After a long pause the mugger said "Well?" Benny replied , "I'm thinking, I'm thinking!!". You will know freedom when you can define your needs or desires and have a means of achieving them.

The battle cry for Libertarianism is small government, low taxes, and maximum personal liberty. That is also the battle cry of Right Wing Republicans and helps explain the Libertarian alliance with Anarcho Capitalism. Then when you throw in the Right Wing Christians who are needed to furnish the votes necessary to win elections, you have the problem of a strong group that want Government Power to legislate morality and turn us into a Christian Theocracy. That gets in the way of the personal liberty that pure Libertarians want.

The problem is in how one defines personal liberty. What is the content of its character? Do you want freedom from ...or... freedom to... or both. Are you a Capitalist Libertarian or a Social Libertarian.

Capital Liberty is about:
1. Right to life
2. Right to property
3. Freedom of Speech
4. Equality before the Law.
5. No restriction on adult behavior that is not harmful.

Social Liberty is about.
1. Right to cultural identity.
2. Right to gainful employment
3. Right to food, clothing, and shelter
4. Right to education.

The first group of standards is about freedom from interference with the ownership of property and impositions on personal liberty. The second group of standards is about entitlement to community service from the Commonwealth and recognition of individual values. 

The first group is supportive of unrestricted Capitalism . The second group prefers a social network to support personal survivial within the community. Both groups claim to support Representative Democracy as the solution to achieve their aims. 

 In most of the standards of Freedom or Liberty they are in agreement. One of the main areas of disagreement is in unrestricted Capitalism which history has shown often leads to unproductive Greed and authoritarianism . The other is that entitlement to share the commonwealth can lead to high taxes, big government, and sub level productivity.

If both groups remain true to their commitment to democracy as a form of government, America will continue to find creative ways to encourage both efficient competition and to insure individual survivial  above grinding Poverty.  If we continue on our current path of confrontation and misinformation, we risk a loss of freedom and the triumph of Special Interest in the form of Extremism and possible Dictatorship. 

 We must decide if we want to live with freedom and Liberty or be ruled by the pursuit of wealth and Power. We must decide the future of America and do it now. 

William Hodge

Friday, September 25, 2009

History and Health Care


Physical Exam - Stethoscope.jpg Newborn Examination 1967.jpg US specialist helping Afghan nomads.jpg

It is one of the oddities of history that the earlier political forays into Medical Care with government participation had a Republican in favor and Labor Unions opposed.
Teddy Roosevelt's Progressive Party supported it and Labor Unions opposed it. Roosevelt
had split with the Republican Party and was influence by the American Association of Labor
Legislation(AALL) and included a plank in his platform. The American Federation of Labor
(AFL) felt worker benefits should be an organizing tool rather than by government
intervention. Another harmful effect in history is that the Socialist Party proposed a medical
System as early as 1904 and opposition has attacked Government Health Care as socialism
and Communism every since. Even as Universal Health Care is involved in its best chance
of becoming a reality, the charge of Socialism is its greatest enemy. It may be the one thing
that can destroy the grass roots power that is necessary to great social change.

The 1920's continued with slow development in Medical health Care delivery systems. The elite and intellectuals pursued Government involvement with out much success. They never learned the are of developing a grass roots movements. The slow growing Union Movement continued to bargain for Health care as an organizing technique. The Science of Medical Care began to develop at a more rapid pace and the access to advance techniques became more complicated and expensive. People began to have hope in medicine and were less willing to accept sickness and death as the will of God. The problem then as now was who can afford it.

The Great Depression seem to be a opportunity to advance the cause, but the overriding concern was work and wages rather than Health care. The Labor Union movement finally got government backing and Roosevelt felt more comfortable getting the Social Security system started rather than fight the Socialist Battles by copying the Health systems developing in Europe. The non-profit Blue cross and Blue shield systems were growing and forming associations with each other but serving individually in the different States.

World WAR ll brought wage controls but opened up benefit possibilities with tax advantages for companies and Medical insurance started a more rapid growth. Private insurance plans found it more profitable to enter the market. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 under Ronald Reagan took away some of the tax advantage of the Blue Cross/Blue shield non profits to allow for profit Companies to compete more effectively.

The next real chance for national Health Insurance came under Harry Truman. Truman's commission on the Health Needs of the Nation declared it a "Basic Human Right". President Truman wanted to protect all people equally against ill health. Unfortunately Southern Democrats did not like the opposition of Truman to Segregation and joined Republicans to oppose most of Truman's major domestic proposals. Seems to echo the Republicans alliance with Right wing Christians of the South in today's politics.

The only real success in bringing health care under Government influence began with the Veterans Care System and then when Medicare and Medicaid Bill was signed into law under the Lyndon Johnson Administration July 30, 1965 Finally President George Bush created the Prescription Drug Benefit under Medicare in 2003. That was an unusual thing for Republicans
to do until you realize that the Bill was never Funded with taxes and was designed to protect the Monopoly Drug companies had on prices in the US. He also gave Private insurance companies a bigger role in providing Coverage for Drugs under The Advantage Plans that allowed them to charge the government higher prices for their service than it cost the Social Security System to do the same job.. That is one of the Major reasons for the fast growing cost of Medical Insurance.
It is also one of the major reasons for Republican Opposition to the Health Care Plans now being advanced through Congress.

So we are once again at a cross road in equatable Health Care for all Americans. After a hundred years of Republican opposition will we fail again. Have we developed the grass root movement we will need to force a vote for justice and fair treatment or will the cry "SOCIALISM" once again blind the people to the hidden hand of Special Interest. Will the protection of high profits for Insurance Companies kill the courage of some Democrats to serve the people instead of themselves. Lives are at stake and we must decide how much a life is worth. It is one thing to accept Death in the fight for Liberty, but how much Death is acceptable in the fight to protect "Profits" and the protection of the wealth of the few over the benefit of the many. Let us at least this time use the power of Democracy to protect the well being of the American People.


Friday, August 21, 2009

My TV pleasure without guilt



I started this particular blog because of a question posed on Plinky ( http://www.plinky.com/) , "What's your 'guilty pleasure' TV show?" I could think of nothing .

I can't say that guilt ever occurred to me while watching TV. Boredom,yes - but guilt is not a typical emotion for me. My taste and my wife's taste are very often different and mutual viewing is sometimes boring for one of us. And then there is my Son and my grandchildren, they also have their differing taste. I guess that is why we have three TVs ,not to mention three computers. I guess guilt will have be a problem for the gods. I don't have time to hide.

Off course, maybe if I could get the Playboy channel, I would watch in secret.....Nah! I would probably invite over some of my Christian friends and tell them that we were going to watch new Movie called "Apocalypse and the New Earth". , and I would video tape their reaction. Except my Christan friends don't trust me. They love me and want to save me from being a "backslider" (A "backslider" is one who has lost his way and returned to the ways of evil). It has always amazed me that a community could pursue consuming Hate and determined Love at the same time.

So much for guilty viewing. This blog was an interesting exercise in learning how to write with almost no redeeming social value. So I decide to publish it anyhow. It is difficult to write life changing social commentary all the time, so I thought I would give you this filler today.


I will throw in a few TV watching images just to add a little class to this time waster.



cartoonstock.com
sodahead.comchetthaker.wordpress.com

.

essentialbaby.com.au

Sunday, August 16, 2009

I Love the Daylilly

I  Love the Daylilly


I love My Daylilly I have since I was five years old. I offer to share my Love. My first experience with dayllies was a mass bed of the old fashion orange daylilly (Hemerocallis fulva). The bed was watered frequently from the sink drain in the kitchen and green and thick most of the year. It bloomed profusely for about two weeks in June every year. I planted my first Vegetable garden along side the flowers We moved away from that small house when I was ten years old I never forgot the beauty of that mass of daylilles.

During my teenage years, the flower beds belonged to my mother and my gardening was mostly vegetables, strawberries, and melons. I did not renew my interest in daylilles, until I returned home from military, got married and purchase my own home.

The first varieties I planted were the old orange ones I remembered from my child hood. I also got the lemon yellow that was one of the earlier varieties and the orange variety that had a bloom with a multi-set of petals(and sepals) instead of the usual six(3 petals and 3 sepals). I started with these because I could get them for free from friends who love the old varieties.

Then I discovered that the father of a friend that I went to high school with was an amateur Hybridize who had developed several named varieties. I then started adding to my collection. Overtime I purchase different varieties that bloom at several different times from early spring to late fall. Some bloomed more than once during during the year and were called rebloomers. I had varieties as small as 12 inches and as tall as more than 3 feet. I had colors from almost white to deep purple. My all time favorite is a small cultivar called STELLA De ORO. Its blooming scape(stem) is about 12 inches tall. It has a small tight yellow bloom and it blooms at least three times during the year. It will multiply very fast. I started with three several years ago and now I have about a couple of hundred plants that I use as border plants along my fence line.

The daylilly is the perfect perennial. It comes in many colors and a variety of shapes and sizes. It can be used in all types of landscapes alone and in combination with other plants. It doesn't take a lot of care. It can be found in a wide range of climates, has few disease and pest problems and can grow in wet and dry. It does well in full sun or partial shade. By using a number of varieties, you can have blooms from early spring to l
ate fall.

I have other flowers(gladiolas, iris, tiger lilles) but none have that special place that started in the heart of a five year old boy. I tend to grow them in rows rather that formal garden layouts because it makes it easier for me to organize them by blooming date and size and flower shape and color. It makes it easier to hybridize(cross pollinate) for new varieties. Take a look at the Daylilly and you will find a new passion if you love flowers.